Tech audit report
Composite PDF roll up across all three audit pillars. Single XEO audit score, per pillar breakdown, per page heat map, prioritised action list.
Executive summary
Three short paragraphs explaining the feature and value.
Tech audit report is the composite PDF roll up across all three audit pillars. A single XEO audit score sits at the top, derived from the AEO, GEO, and SEO audit scores weighted by relevance to AI search visibility. Below, per pillar breakdowns. Below that, a per page heat map of failing checks visualised across the entire brand.
The prioritised action list closes the report. An AI agent reads the full audit data, identifies the highest leverage fixes by weight times failing page count times pillar impact, and surfaces the top five for the next sprint. Each item links back into the workspace so developers can click through from the PDF preview into the live remediation surfaces immediately.
One tab. The artefact a marketing lead hands to the CTO or development team to plan a technical sprint or remediation cycle. The artefact a development team uses to scope effort and assign tickets. Designed top to bottom to be read by both audiences without back and forth, with technical detail in the appendix for engineers.
Key highlights
Five capability points teams should know about quickly.
- Single XEO audit score across all three pillars
- Per pillar breakdown with delta since last scan
- Per page heat map of failing checks
- Prioritised action list ready for sprint planning
- PDF artefact for marketing and engineering alignment
Top FAQs
Five common questions answered for fast practical clarity.
Who is the Tech audit report for?
Marketing leads needing a clean summary to share with development teams, CTOs and engineering leads scoping technical sprints, agencies handing recommendations to client developers, and head of growth roles reporting to executives on technical readiness. Designed to communicate scope and priority without requiring deep navigation into the workspace audit surfaces.
How does this report change the conversation between marketing and engineering?
Marketing leads usually struggle to scope AI search work for engineering because the dimensions feel abstract. The report converts AEO, GEO, SEO scoring into concrete page level tickets with weighted effort estimates and a per page failure map. Engineering sees a sprint ready backlog. The conversation shifts from we need to improve AI visibility to fix these eight pages this quarter, which moves work faster.
How does the action list prioritise?
Weight times failing page count times pillar impact factor. Weight captures how much the check matters to scoring. Failing page count captures how widespread the issue is. Pillar impact captures whether the pillar is currently weak or strong in the workspace XEO score. The product surfaces the top five for the next sprint with effort estimates.
Can the report compare against a baseline?
Yes. The Compare against dropdown selects any prior scan as the baseline. Pillar deltas, page level deltas, and the action list all recompute against the chosen baseline. Useful for quarterly reviews showing what was fixed over the past quarter and what remains, framed as progress against the last all hands report cleanly.
How is this different from the Visibility report?
Different question, different artefact. The Visibility report answers how visible is the brand in AI search. The Tech audit report answers how ready is the brand technically. Visibility lags audit by two to four weeks typically, so the audit report often previews where visibility scores are heading. Both PDFs ship from the same scan cycle.